Lost Password? No account yet? Register
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • default color
  • red color
  • green color

National Writers Syndicate

Wednesday
Aug 20th
Home arrow News arrow Article arrow Judicial Watch Asks FEC to Investigate House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
Judicial Watch Asks FEC to Investigate House Speaker Nancy Pelosi PDF Print E-mail
Written by YIKES   

by Jill S. Farrell 

.... and Al Gore Group for Violating Campaign Finance Laws

National Ad Campaign Paid for by Al Gore’s Alliance for Climate Protection Represents In-Kind Contribution to Pelosi Campaign 

( Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it filed a formal complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Al Gore’s Alliance for Climate Protection concerning their television advertising campaign that appears to violate federal campaign finance laws.  The complaint concerns the “We Campaign” television ads featuring Pelosi and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.  The campaign is a project of the Alliance for Climate Protection, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization founded by former Vice President Al Gore.  Judicial Watch filed a formal complaint with the Internal Revenue Service as well. 

A press release about the “We Campaign” indicates that the Pelosi advertisement was scheduled to “run nationally on network and cable channels” – which presumably would have included Pelosi’s San Francisco, California district.  It has been reported that the commercial “has run about 300 times on national cable networks such as Fox News and CNN” since its debut on April 18, 2008.

According to Judicial Watch’s complaint, dated May 23, 2008, this commercial represents both an in-kind contribution to the Pelosi campaign and a campaign contribution by the Alliance because Speaker Pelosi is a candidate for Congress and has run within 90 days of her June 3 primary. 

According to the FEC, “When an individual or political committee pays for a communication that is coordinated with a candidate or party committee, the communication is considered an in-kind contribution to that candidate or party committee and is subject to the limits, prohibitions and reporting requirements of the federal campaign finance law.”  Judicial Watch’s complaint details the various ways in which the ad meets the legal definition of a “coordinated communication.”

Nancy Pelosi and Al Gore may want to the save the world, but they still have to follow federal law.  This multi-million dollar contribution to Pelosi by Al Gore’s group is absolutely prohibited.  The FEC and the IRS ought to act quickly to enforce the law,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. 

To read Judicial Watch’s FEC complaint in its entirety, please click here.

Jill S. Farrell

Director of Public Affairs
Judicial Watch
501 School St, SW, Suite 500
Washington, DC   20024

Direct  202.646.5188
Cell  703.405.8905

Director Bioshttp://www.judicialwatch.org/dirbios.shtml

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a constitutionally conservative, nonpartisan educational foundation that promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.





Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!
 
< Prev   Next >
Advertisement

 
AIC new radio show - AMERICA BETRAYED - hosted by NWS' JOHN CLARK 


Song Player



Tag Clouds

ability access according action actions actually administration agenda aliens allowed amendment american americans article attack attention attorney author authority available believe benefits better billion border borders brought business california called campaign candidate candidates castruccio center change children chinese church citizen citizens clearly clinton coming committed common communist community congress conservative consider considered constitution constitutional continue control corporate corporations corrupt countries country county course courts create created criminal current custody defense democrat democrats department destroy destruction different divorce dollars domestic economic economy elected election energy enforcement especially evidence example experience families family father fathers federal fighting financial following forced forces foreign freedom friends future general george getting global groups having health hillary history illegal illegals immigrants immigration important including income individual industry information instead insurance interests international internet invasion involved islamic issues judges judicial justice kentucky killed lawyer lawyers leaders liberal liberty little living longer making market marriage matter mccain medical member members mexican mexico middle military million millions mother movement murder muslim nation national nations nature necessary number office official officials organization outside parent parents passed people percent person personal police policy political politicians politics population position possible present president presidential prince prison private problem problems process program property protect provide public published question radical reality really reason received recent recently religious report reported republican required responsible result revolution rights saying school schools second section security senate senator service services simply single social society soldiers special speech statement states street subject support supreme taking terror terrorist terrorists that’s things thought treason trying understand united veterans violence washington welfare working written

social bookmarking