National Writers Syndicate - STEAL THIS DOCUMENTARY

Home

News

UWRITE NOW

STEAL THIS DOCUMENTARY

Written by Jim Untershine

If you balance an awkward premise on Occam's razor - .....

.... you may feel that the Divorce Industry is in collusion with radical feminism to deliver women to the Internal Revenue Service, and their children to the Foster Care Industry. A fresh look is necessary to establish a road map to peace in Middle America.

STEAL THIS DOCUMENTARY
What is the last thing that you KNOW is true

Jim Untershine, GZS of LB, 08-09-07

Many believe that America is still the land of the free, the home of the brave, and that our Constitutional rights are still being recognized and protected. Many believe that our elected representatives still have the power to determine this country's destiny, that major media is still independent of government and will promptly inform the public when government turns on it's citizens. I believe we still have time to make those beliefs true again.

"If you want to believe in it, then believe in it. Just because something isn't true doesn't mean you can't believe in it. Sometimes, the things that may or may not be true are the things that a man needs to believe in the most. That people are basically good, and that honor, courage and virtue mean everything. Power and money - money and power mean nothing. That good always triumphs over evil. And that true love never dies. You remember that - and whether it is true or not - you'll see that those things are the only things worth believing in." (the movie 'Second Hand Lions')

Phyllis Schlafly may provide her reaction to recent revelations regarding the hijacking of feminism by those paid to deliver women and mothers to the IRS in the name of freedom or in the name of their own children. The devastating effects of the Violence Against Women Act that has somehow grown so huge it is now being imposed on the rest of the world. Schlafly can also discuss her own battle against illegal immigration, selling US patents to other countries, etc.
http://www.eagleforum.org/

Wendy McElroy may turn her back on FoxNews to lend credibility to the negative effect radical feminism has had on women who wish to seek equality. The insatiable appetite of the Foster Care programs in snatching children from both their biological parents without proving abuse. McElroy can elaborate on the family law injustices forced on breadwinning parents (regardless of gender) in Family Court
http://www.wendymcelroy.com/bio.htm

Rachel Allen of the National Organization of women can fill us in regarding the reasons behind "The Family Court Report in California". Why NOW believed successful women in their organization were being separated from their children in Family Court. Why women who get pregnant fear for their life and why women who follow their divorce advice all end up on welfare. Allen could be asked 'What did she know - and when did she stop knowing it?" regarding NOW being funded by the US government to force all women to pay taxes.
http://canow.org/famlaw_report/famlawreport.php

Deborah Courtney from the Minute Man Project may update us on their progress in stopping the Mexican invasion. The reasons for changes in leadership, why her husband was arrested for not paying child support, and why her husband is still in jail. Provide any reasons to believe that our government has gotten the message that all US citizens have the right to defend America.

http://www.notavictim.org/

Stephen Baskerville, the President of the American Coalition of Fathers and Children (ACFC) , will expose the political apparatus that has cast a pestilence on Families in America for the last 30 years. The brutal war that fathers must wage to stay in the lives of their own children. The deaths attributed to Family Law injustice and the misdirected anguish provoked by the Divorce Industry.
http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

Coming in Spring 2007 from Cumberland House Publishing: "Taken Into Custody: The War Against Fathers, Marriage, and the Family"

http://stephenbaskerville.net/Book_Taken_Into_Custody.htm

Taken Into Custody is the most comprehensive exposé yet published by a major publishing house on the depredations of the divorce industry. I say this conscious that I am standing on the shoulders of others. This book was made possible by the pioneering efforts of authors who have preceded me (all of whose work it draws upon): Jed Abraham, Sanford Braver, Warren Farrell, Jeffery Leving, David Levy, Melanie Phillips, Dean Tong, Cathy Young, plus Richard Doyle, Bai Macfarlane, Judy Parejko, Robert Seidenberg, and others (including, most recently, Phyllis Schlafly in the revised paperback edition of her latest book). Yet because they were breaking ground, most of these writers were either pressured to tone down their language or forced to self-publish. This is the first book from a major publisher that has been permitted to speak the unvarnished truth about the divorce machinery: its destruction of families, its violations of the Constitution, its disregard for due process of law, its voracious appetite for children, parents, and families. This is no tirade however but a thoroughly documented study of a previously neglected abuse by a credentialed political scientist. The result is a major breakthrough in exposing the greatest civil rights abuse of our time and the most repressive government machine ever created in the United States.

Robert Williams of Policy Studies Inc can describe his company's contribution to the Child Support Enforcement (CSE) agencies in 49 states, Canada, Australia, the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico. A description of what CSE agencies are allowed to do to parents who don't pay as ordered (as described in USC 42 666). Williams can dazzle us with the various schemes each state uses to arrive at the child support amount parents are ordered to pay or are put in jail if they can't. Compare the Child Support Guideline in California with the amounts reported to Congress by the Clearinghouse for Child Support Enforcement Statistics. Draw on his company's experience in California to answer why CSE only receives 33% of their operating costs from the Federal government while all other states receive 66%. Williams may pontificate on the billions of dollars that are reportedly uncollected by parents across the country and why PSI should not be blamed.
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/programs/cfcc/pdffiles/csguideline2005.pdf

Elaine Sorensen from the Urban Institute can explain why California CSE has failed to collect child support from parents. Why California CSE is allowed to disburse collections from parents as the interest on the debt that was assigned by Family Court. Explain how support collections are supposed to be disbursed by CSE. Sorensen may shed some light on how states are allowed to double the collections disbursed as interest since interest, welfare, and Foster Care collections must be distributed last. Provide information as to how each state is paid performance incentives based on CSEs child support collections from parents. Provide any possible reasons why their report on child support collectabillity is not available on the internet anymore.
http://www.gndzerosrv.com/Legislative%20Pages/pdf/CA%20CS%20Arrears.pdf

Maureen Pirog/Good from the Institute for Family and Social Responsibility (FASR) can illuminate us on the importance of fraudulently diminishing the reported child support awards across all states except Indiana. Explain the benefits of falsely presenting Indiana to the Ways and Means Committee as possessing the most aggressive child support guideline in the nation. Pirog may also provide insight as to where their child support data came from and why it has never been updated since 1997.
http://www.spea.indiana.edu/fasr/Publications/policy%20brief%203.html

Glenn Sacks, Michael McCormick, Dave Usher, Richar' Farr, Roger Gay, Kathleen Parker, Cornell Smith, Michael Galluzzo, Alec Baldwin, Jim Carrey, and many others could provide more details of how far our government is willing to go to thin out our numbers, control more taxpayers, and steal our children.

The Family Law AniMatrix (for the kids) which places the charactors that were just interviewed into a movie teenagers already love.

Replace the 'spoon' with 'law' and replace the 'battery' with 'money' and then 'THE MATRIX' becomes 'FAMILY LAW'

"Do not try to bend the law, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth. There is no law. Then you will see that it is not the law that bends, it is only yourself."

"We came to realize the obviousness of the truth; What is Family Law? --- Control, it's a state-operated dream world, designed to keep you under control, in order to turn a human being into money."
Family Law Reloaded: http://www.gndzerosrv.com/Web%20Pages/fl_reloaded.htm

Family Law Revolution: http://www.gndzerosrv.com/Web%20Pages/fl_revolution.htm

Family Law AniMatrix: Conclusion withheld until release

Jim Untershine, Long Beach, CA 90815, (310) 418-1736, This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it , www.gndzerosrv.com

Jim Untershine holds a BSEE from Mississippi State University and has 13 years experience in feedback control system design. Mr. Untershine is currently using the teachings of Werner Heisenberg and Henry David Thoreau to expose Family Law in California as the exploitation of children for money and the indentured servitude of heterosexual taxpayers who dare to raise children in this country.